| Regulations – theory, practice and productivity
ACA (2005) Submission to Taskforce on Reducing the Regulatory Burden on Business. Australian Consumers’ Association, Dec.
ACCC (2008) Report of the ACCC inquiry into the competitiveness of retail prices for standard groceries
ACCI (2003) Reducing the Burdens of Regulation. Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
ACCI (2005) Holding back the red tape avalanche, A regulatory reform agenda for Australia, position paper. Australian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry. Nov.
ACM (1994) Building a Competitive Future: A strategy to develop Australian manufacturing. Australian Chamber of Manufactures.
AIG (2004) Compliance costs time and money. Australian Industry Group. Nov.
AIG (2005) Who’s Winning – The shape of global competition. Australian Industry Group.
Ayres I, Braithwaite J (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford UP.
Banks G (2003) The good, the bad and the ugly: economic perspectives on regulation in Australia, Productivity Commission, Address to the Small Business Coalition, www.pc.gov.au
Banks G (2003) Reducing the Business Costs of Regulation. Productivity Commission, Speech.
Banks G (2005) Policy Implications of an ageing Australia, Financial Review Ageing Population Summit.
Banks G (2005) Structural reform Australian-style: lessons for others?, Productivity Commission, www.pc.gov.au
Banks (2006) Tackling the underlying causes of over-regulation: an update. www.pc.gov.au/speeches/
Bakker, Iliopoulou (2007) Studying the past to plan for the future: A case study analysis of the unintended and indirect effects of regulation on productivity, UK report.
Barkow E (2009) The Prosecutor as Regulatory Agency, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1428934
BCA (2008) Towards a Seamless Economy, report.
BCA (5.2005) Business Regulation Action Plan For Future Prosperity. Business Council of Australia.
BCA (9.2005) Locking in Prosperity, An Action Plan. Business Council of Australia.
BCA (12.2005) Submission to the Taskforce on Reducing the Regulatory Burden on Business.
BCA (1993) Australia 2010, Creating the future Australia. Business Council of Australia.
BIE (1995) Industry brief: Small business – a growing part
of our economy. Bureau of Industry Economics.
Black J (2002) Regulatory Conversations, Journal of Law
and Society, 29, 1, 163-196
Blackman A, Boyd J, Krupnick A, Mazurek J (2001) The Economics of Tailored Regulation and the Implications for Project XL. Resources for the future (RFF) USA. www.rff.org/ [12.05]
BRTF (2001) Economic Regulators. UK Better Regulation Task Force.
BRTF (2003a) Independent Regulators. UK Better Regulation Task Force.
BRTF (2003b) Principles of Good Regulation, UK Better Regulation Task Force, www.brc.gov.uk [2.06]
BRTF (2004) Avoiding Regulatory Creep. UK Better Regulation Task Force. www.brc.gov.uk/ Oct.
BRTF (2005) Annual Report. Better Regulation From Design to Delivery. UK Better Regulation Task Force.
Chappell D, Halstead B (1992) Entrepreneurial Crime: Impact, Detection and Regulation.
CIE (2005) Principles for national reform. Learning lessons from NCP. Centre for International Economics, Report for National Competition Council, NCC Occasional Series, Canberra.
COAG (1995) NCP Reform Package and Competition Principles Agreement.
COAG (1995) Principles & Guidelines for National Standard Setting and Regulatory Action by Ministerial Councils and Standard-Setting Bodies. Council of Australian Governments. Reissued 1997, 2004.
COAG (2006) Communiqué: A New National Reform Agenda. Council of Australian Governments, Meeting 10 February.
COAG WG (2005) Human Capital Reform. COAG National Reform Initiative Working Group. December.
COAG Agenda and Meeting papers 2007-2009.
Coglianese C, Lazer D (2000) Management-Based Regulation: Using Private Sector Management to Achieve Public Goals. John
F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
COSBOA (2005) Submission to the Regulation Taskforce. Council of Small Business Organisations of Australia Ltd Nov
Coyle D (2005) Eurosclerosis Revisited, strategy + business, 39, 1-5
Crampton P (2002) Striking the right balance between competition and regulation, APEC-OECD Co-operative Initiative on Regulatory Reform. Korea. www.oecd.org/
Day G, Shoemaker P (2005) Scanning the Periphery, Harvard Business Review.
Deighton-Smith R (2001) National Competition Policy – Key lessons for policy-making from its implementation, Australian J of Public Administration, 60, 3, 29-41
Dohrmann T, Mendonca L (2004) Boosting government productivity, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4,
DPL (2004) Legislative Instruments Bill 2003, Bills Digest No. 26. Department of the Parliamentary Library.
EU (2002) Action plan: Simplifying & improving the regulatory environment. Commission of the European Communities. europa.eu.int
Federal Government (1997) More Time for Business statement
Garnaut R (2004) Has Australia lost its appetite for economic reform?, The Australian, 29 July
Gleeson M (2001) The Growth of Legislation and Regulation, International Conference on Regulation Reform. Sydney, Australia. www.hcourt.gov.au
Goldman Sachs (2004) Dreaming With BRICs: The Path to 2050. https://www.gs.com
Grabosky P, Braithwaite J (1993) Business Regulation and Australia’s Future. Australian Institute of Criminology.
Graham M (2001) Information as Risk Regulation. Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Hahn R, Litan RE (2004) When the Rules Are the Real Risks, The Wall Street Journal Online, 1 November
Haines F, Gurney D (2002) The shadows of the law: Contemporary approaches to regulation and the problem of regulatory conflict, Current Issues In Regulation: Enforcement and Compliance. Melb. Also: Law & Policy, 25:4 10.2003
Hilmer (1993) National Competition Policy, Report of the Independent Committee of Inquiry.
IC (1997) Reducing the Regulatory Burden – Does Firm Size Matter? Industry Commission.
Knudsen OK, Scandizzo PL (2005) Bringing social standards into project evaluation under dynamic uncertainty, Risk Analysis, 25, 2, 457
Mason CJ (1991) Law and economics, Monash University Law Review, 17, 167
Mason CJ (1992) Changing the Law, Reform (ALRC), 63, 3
McKinsey (1995) Australia’s Economic Performance. McKinsey Global Institute. November.
NCC (1999) Guidelines for NCP Legislation Reviews. National Competition Council and CIE.
NCC (2005) Submission to the taskforce on reducing the regulatory burden on business. National Competition Council.
NSW (1999) Report by the Public Management Service of the OECD on regulatory impact assessment in New South Wales. Parliamentary Regulation Review Committee. Jan.
NSW (2000) Re-engineering Regulations for New South Wales for the 21st Century. Parliamentary Regulation Review Committee
NSW (2001) Proceedings, International Conference on Regulation Reform Management and Scrutiny of Legislation. Sydney, Australia.
OECD (1991) Synthesis Report on Competition Policy and Deregulation. Organisation for Economic Development and Co-operation.
OECD (1995) Recommendation of the Council on Improving the Quality of Government Regulation.
OECD (1996) Regulatory Reform, A Country Study of Australia.
OECD (1997a) Policy recommendations for Regulatory Reform.
OECD (1997b) Regulatory Impact Analysis: Best Practices in OECD Countries,
OECD (2001) Businesses’ views on Red Tape – Administrative and regulatory burdens on small- and medium-sized enterprises. www.oecd.org/
OECD (2002a) Reviews of Regulatory Reform Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance. www.oecd.org/
OECD (2002b) Reviews of Regulatory Reform, United Kingdom – Challenges at the Cutting Edge.
OECD (2003a) From Red Tape to Smart Tape: Administrative Simplification in OECD Countries.
OECD (2003b) Regulation, Productivity and Growth: OECD Evidence. www.oecd.org/eco
OECD (2005a) The Benefits Of Liberalising Product Markets
and Reducing Barriers To International Trade and Investment: The Case of The United States and the European Union.
OECD (2005b) Guiding Principles for Regulatory Quality and Performance. www.oecd.org/
OECD (2005c) Product market competition and economic performance in Australia. OECD Economics Department WP 451, Ziegelschmidt et al. www.oecd.org
OECD (2006) Economic Policy Reforms: Going for Growth.
ORR (1997) Report on Grey Letter Law (Quasi-legislation). Report of the Commonwealth Interdepartmental Committee
on Quasi-regulation (Office of Regulation Review chair).
ORR (1998) A Guide to Regulation. Office of Regulation Review.
ORR (2005) Regulation and Its Review 2004-05. Office of Regulation Review.
Parham D (2003) Sources of Australia’s Productivity Revival, www.pc.gov.au
PC (2000) Achieving better regulation of services. Productivity Commission conference, ANU.
PC (2005) Review of National Competition Policy Reforms. Productivity Commission, Report 33. February.
Productivity Commission, Australia (2007-2009) Reports of Reviews of Regulatory burdens on Business.
Pearce D, Stoeckel A, Harris D (1993) What’s Holding Business Back? Centre for International Economics (CIE), Canberra.
Peltzman S (2004) Regulation and the Natural Progress of Opulence. http//aei-brookings.org/ [1.12.05]
Posner RA (1995) Overcoming Law, Harvard University Press
Rahman J (2005) Comparing Australian and United States productivity, Australian Treasury, treasury.gov.au/ [9.05]
RTF (2005) Reducing the Regulatory Burden on Business, Issues paper. Regulation Taskforce. October.
RTF (2006) Rethinking Regulation: Report of the Taskforce on Reducing Regulatory Burdens on Business.
Rubin P (1999) Judge-made law, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics //users.ugent.be/gdegeest/ [23.1.06]
Tanner L (2008) Relieving the burden on business – Labor’s deregulation agenda, speech.
SAA (2005) Submission by Standards Australia to the Regulation Review Task Force,
Sturgess G (1994) Thirty different governments – The Report of the NSW Commission of Inquiry into Red Tape. For NSW Govt.
VCEC (2004) Regulatory Barriers to Regional Economic Development Inquiry report.
VCEC (2005 and 2007) The Victorian regulatory system. Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission. January.
Victoria (2005) A Third Wave of Reform – a New National Reform Initiative for COAG. The proposals of the Victorian Premier.
Welsman SJ (1994) Australia’s local land-use planning laws and practices: Competition law’s next challenge?, Trade Practices Law Journal, 2, 173-187
Welsman SJ (1995) In Queensland Wire, The High Court has provided an elegant backstop to ‘use’ of market power, Consumer & Competition Law Journal, 2, 280-315
Welsman SJ (1996) Commercial power and competitor litigation, Australian Business Law Review, 24, 2, 85
Welsman SJ (2001) Laws Regulating Business in the early 1990s. Facilitation, Control, Overload? PhD Sydney University
|
RegSciLaw – regulatory science law and markets
ALRC (2004) Discussion 68: Gene Patenting and Human Health.
ALRC (2003) Essentially Yours: The Protection of Human Genetic Information in Australia Report 96.
ALRC (2000) Managing justice: A review of the federal civil justice system Report 89.
ALRC (1999) Experts, Adversarial Background Paper 6.
ABA American Bar Association (2003) Nano/Biotechnology: From Start-Up to Market. www.abanet.org/scitech/annual/7.pdf
Angell, M (1997) Science on Trial: The clash of medical evidence and law in the breast implant case WW Norton & Co US
Batterham R, Chief Scientist; Miles D, Chair – Innovation Summit Working Group (2000) Australia‘s Innovation Future – The Vision for Australia in the 21st Century.
Bates GM (2002) Environmental Law in Australia, 5th edn, Butterworths, Sydney.
Bauer MW, Gaskill G (2002) Biotechnology – The making of a Global Controversy, Cambridge UP.
Boas, Marie (1970) The Scientific Renaissance 1450-1630, Fontana London.
Boorstin, Daniel J, 1941/1996, The Mysterious Science of the Law; An essay on Blackstone’s Commentaries, Univ Chicago Press, Chicago & London. Text of the Commentaries, www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/blackstone/blacksto.htm.
Brennan Inquiry Report (Hall matter) for University of New South Wales, 2003.
Brockman, John (ed), 2002, The Next Fifty Years – Science in the first half of the Twenty-First Century, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.
Brown, JR (2001) Who Rules in Science – an Opinionated Guide to the Science Wars, Harvard UP, USA.
Case DT, Ritter JB (2000) Disconnects between Science and the Law, 78 Chemical & Engineering News7:49-60.
Castel JG (1973) Legal implications of biomedical science and technology in the twenty-first century, 51 Canadian Bar Rev 119-120.
Conk, George W Esq, 1996, Legend vs. Pragmatism, 2 B.U.J.SCI.&TECH.L. 9 (Boston U)
Corne PH (1990) The influence of traditional normative mechanisms of behaviour on the Japanese legal system, 12 Sydney Law Rev 346 at 346-347.
Council of State Governments USA (CSG), 1999, A State Official’s Guide to Sound Science. stars.csg.org/reports/1999/science/sound.pdf dl 6 04.
Dawkins, Richard, 1986/1991/2000, The Blind Watchmaker, Penguin London.
Edmond G After Objectivity: Expert Evidence and Procedural Reform [2003] SydLRev 8
Epstein RA (1994) The moral and practical dilemmas of an underground economy, 103 The Yale Law Journal 2157.
Faigman, David L, 2000, Legal Alchemy – The use and misuse of science in the law, WH Freeman and Company New York. [Also Faigman California U, on Expert Witnesses, plus: Science in the Law: Standards, Statistics and Research Issues; Science in the Law: Social and Behavioural Science Issues; Science in the Law: Forensic Science Issues]
Federal Judicial Center 2000, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 2nd edn, USA. Contents include: Introduction S Breyer; Supreme Court’s Trilogy on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony M Berger; Management of Expert Evidence W Schwarzer and J Cecil; How Science Works, D Goodstein; Reference Guide on Statistics, D Kaye and D Freedman.
Ferguson, Marilyn (1973) The Brain Revolution, Davis-Poynter London.
Feynman, Richard P, 1963/1998, The Meaning of it All, Penguin London.
Foster KR, Huber PW (1997) Judging Science – Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts, MIT Press.
Freckleton I, Selby H (2002) Expert Evidence, Law Book Company Ltd, AUSTRALIA.
Gigerenzer, Gerd (2002) Calculated risks – How to know when numbers deceive you, Simon & Schuster NY.
Goldberg, Steven (1994) Culture Clash Law and Science in America, New York U Press
Greenberg, Daniel S (2001) Science, Money and Politics – Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion, U Chicago Press, USA.
Haack, Susan (2003) Defending Science, within reason – between scientism and cynicism, Prometheus Books NY.
Hertz, N (2001) The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy, Arrow UK.
Hill, R; Stokes W (1999) On Animal Experimentation: Seeking Common Ground Validation and Regulatory Acceptance of Alternatives, Cambridge Q Healthcare Ethics 8 73–79
Hoke F, Between The Traditionally Contentious Professions, The Scientist 8[13]:1, 1994
Huber P (1991) Galileo’s Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom, Basic Books USA
Jasanoff, Sheila (1995) Science at the Bar – Law, Science and Technology in America, Harvard UP.
Johnston R (2002) Science Versus the Public: Water Matters, www.aciic.org.au, dl 6 04
Johnston R (2003) A Study of Australian Participation in Multilateral Megascience Projects, for DEST
Kelly, Kevin (1998) The Third Culture, Science, Vol 279, Issue 5353, 992-993.
Kirby MD 1983, Reform the Law, Oxford UP, Melbourne.
Kitcher, Philip, 1993, The Advancement of Science – Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions, Oxford University Press UK/USA.
Kitcher, Philip, 2001, Science, Truth and Democracy, Oxford University Press
Kuhn, Thomas S, 1962/1969 3rd edn 1996, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Laursen JC (1991) Adam Smith as legal and constitutional theorist, 16 Law & Social Inquiry (J Am Bar Assn) 615-619.
Law Council of Australia, 2001, 2010 A Discussion paper : Challenges for the Legal Profession.
Lepkowski W, Has ‘big money’ corrupted science? Review: Greenberg DS, Science, Money, and Politics 2001. www.livingwiththegenie.org/topicb dl 8.03
Lerner, Lawrence S, 2000, Good Science, Bad Science: Teaching Evolution In The States, Fordham Foundation. www.edexcellence.net/foundation dl 6.04
McSherry, Corynne 2001, Who owns academic work? Battling for control of intellectual property, Harvard UP, USA.
The National Academies, 2001, A convergence of Science and Law: A summary report of the first meeting of the Science, Technology and Law Panel, National Academy Press Washington DC.
National Academy of Sciences USA, 1995, On Being a Scientist – Responsible Conduct in Research, 2nd edn, National Academy Press Washington DC.
National Science Foundation USA, Biology and Law: Challenges of adjudicating competing claims in a democracy. Report of workshops 1995, 1996.
Newell P, Glover D, 2003, Business and biotechnology: regulation and the politics of influence, Institute of Development Studies (IDS), Sussex UK.
NHMRC / AVCC Statement and Guidelines on Research Practice, at May 2004.
Posner RA, 1995, Overcoming Law, Harvard University Press
Price, Elizabeth (2000) Biotechnology: The Next Litigation Frontier, signalsmag.com dl5.04
Prosser WL (1960) The assault upon the citadel (Strict liability to the consumer), 69 The Yale Law Journal 1099
Schuck, Peter H (1993) Multi-culturalism Redux: Science, Law and Politics, 11Yale Law & Policy Review 1, 25, quoted in Goldberg p 15.
Silvers RB, 1995/1997, Hidden Histories of Science, Granta Publications UK, including: Kevles, Daniel J – Pursuing the unpopular: history of courage, viruses and cancer; Sacks, Oliver – Scotoma: Forgetting and neglect in science.
Stocker, John, in The Australian Biotechnology Report 2001 - Commonwealth of Australia, Ernst & Young and Freehills.
Straughan, Roger, ~2004, Ethics, Morality And Animal Biotechnology, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK, bbsrc.ac.uk/tools/download/ dl7.04
Sunder, Madhavi, 2003, To Yale Legal Theory Workshop participants. dl5.04 yale.edu/law/ltw/papers/ltw-sunder.pdf
Sutton, Victoria, 2001, Law and Science, Cases and Materials, Carolina Academic Press USA. Introductions by D. Allen Bromley, S. Jay Plager.
Tjiong RTT, 1998, Reforming the Law on Expert Evidence,
MJA 168: 53-54
Ulen TS, A Nobel Prize In Legal Science: Theory, Empirical Work, and the Scientific Method in the Study of Law. Univ Illinois 2002 law.uiuc.edu/lrev/publications dl 4.04.
Vick DW (2204) Interdisciplinarity and the Discipline of Law, 31 J of Law and Society 163
Weeramantry CG, 1982, An Invitation to the Law,
Butterworths Sydney
Weinberg, Steven, 2001, Facing Up: Science and its Cultural Adversaries, Harvard UP.
Welsman SJ, High Court chews the grass! The AgLaw Papers 2004, Univ New England
Welsman SJ. Commercial power and competitor litigation(1996) 24 Australian Business Law Review 85
Westfall RS, The Scientific Revolution, History of Science Society, vol 15.3 (1986) dl4.04 web.clas.ufl.edu/
Ziman, John, 2000/2003, Real Science – What it is, and
what it means, Cambridge U Press.
A few cases
Beaudesert Shire Council v Smith (1966) 120 CLR 145
Cole v Whitfield (1988) 165 CLR 360
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Blackmun J Opinion for the Court, Rehnquist, C.J, concurring/dissenting.
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562
General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997).
John v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 166 CLR 417
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 119 S.Ct. 1167 (1999).
Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1
MacPherson v Buick Motor Co., 217 NY 382, 111 NE 1050 (1916)
Makita Australia Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305
Northern Territory and others v Mengel and others (1995)
129 ALR 1
Queensland Wire Industries Proprietary Limited v The Broken
Hill Proprietary Company Limited (1989) 167 CLR 177
Woollahra Municipal Council v Minister for the Environment (1991) 23 NSWLR 710.
|